Application Registered 31-03-2025
Comments Until 28-05-2025
Decision - Refused 15-07-2025
Camden, London – A controversial planning application (reference 2025/0939/P) by St George West London Limited for the Camden Goods Yard site at Chalk Farm Road, NW1 8EH, has been refused planning permission by the London Borough of Camden on 15 July 2025. The application sought to significantly alter previously approved plans, most notably by reducing the percentage of affordable housing.
Proposed Amendments and Applicant's Rationale
The application was a Section 73 variation of existing planning permissions (2017/3847/P, as amended by 2020/0034/P, 2020/3116/P, and 2022/3646/P) for the redevelopment of the former Morrisons supermarket and petrol filling station site. The developer, St George West London Limited, is a subsidiary of the Berkeley Group.
The key proposed changes included:
A reduction in the total number of homes from 644 to 637 units (a decrease of 7 homes).
A substantial reduction in affordable housing from 203 units (38.1% by habitable room) to just 83 units (15% by habitable room).
A shift in the affordable housing tenure mix from 66% London Affordable Rent (LAR) and 34% Intermediate Rent to 39% LAR and 61% Intermediate Rent.
Other design modifications, such as the insertion of additional staircases in Blocks C, E1, and F to comply with updated fire safety guidelines and building regulations, a marginal increase to Block E1's footprint, and minor reductions in heights for some blocks.
St George argued that these changes were necessary to mitigate commercial risks and improve the viability of the project, in line with government policies aimed at accelerating housing delivery to address the national and London housing crisis. The applicant highlighted Camden's acute housing needs, significant housing delivery deficits, and the increasing number of households in temporary accommodation.
Strong Objections from Residents and Councillors
The application faced significant opposition from local residents, community groups, and councillors. Key concerns raised included:
Deep concern over the proposed reduction in affordable homes, describing it as a "social disaster" and a failure to address Camden's housing crisis, which includes thousands on waiting lists and increasing homelessness.
The reduction fails to meet Camden’s Local Plan policy H4, which targets 50% affordable housing for developments of this size, and also undermines the Mayor’s London Plan strategic target for half of new homes to be affordable.
Allegations that the applicant’s viability assessment was "fundamentally flawed".
Concerns that the reduction would negatively impact community diversity and contribute to schools "emptying" as families cannot afford to live in Camden.
Objections to the developer's statement that the development would be "paused" if the Section 73 application were not granted, viewing this as a "threat" that undermines housing policy.
Calls for a "good balance" between private and other tenures, citing prior agreements for a mixed-tenure site.
Camden Council's Decision and Reasons for Refusal
The London Borough of Camden ultimately refused the application, providing several reasons for their decision. The Council determined that:
The proposal failed to provide a suitable amount or mix of affordable housing, which was deemed contrary to policies H4, H6, and H7 of the Camden Local Plan 2017 and policies GG4 and H5 of the London Plan 2021. An independent viability review commissioned by the Council concluded that a net surplus of £65.25 million could be achieved, indicating that additional affordable housing was indeed possible.
The application lacked necessary legal agreements to mitigate negative impacts across various areas, including highway reinstatement costs, car-free development, bus infrastructure safeguarding, construction/demolition management plans, travel plans, public realm improvements, parking management, cycle hire schemes, affordable housing and accessibility plans, community benefits, environmental strategies (sustainability and energy plans, carbon offset), employment contributions, and an urban farm management plan.
The development did not include an up-to-date flood risk assessment or emergency plan for a site where primary access is at high risk of surface water flooding, thus conflicting with Camden Local Plan policy CC3 and London Plan policy SI12.
While minor design changes themselves didn't worsen heritage harm, the substantial reduction in affordable housing meant the public benefits no longer outweighed the "less than substantial harm to heritage assets" identified in previous approvals.
Greater London Authority (GLA) Review
The Mayor of London's office, through the Deputy Mayor for Planning, Regeneration and the Fire Service, initially advised that the application did not comply with the London Plan. Issues highlighted by GLA officers included the proposed affordable housing reduction, and outstanding information regarding energy strategy compliance, whole life-cycle carbon, circular economy, urban greening, flood risk, and water efficiency.
However, in their Stage 2 response, the GLA confirmed they were content for Camden Council to determine the case itself, rather than intervening to direct refusal or take over the application. They noted that while the proposal had a "significant impact on the implementation of the London Plan" due to its potential housing contribution, there were "no sound planning reasons" for the Mayor to intervene, especially since the Council had already decided to refuse the application, citing the scheme's failure to provide the maximum viable level of affordable housing.
The Camden Goods Yard site, with its high Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) of 5 to 6a, was intended to be car-free except for accessible parking and car club spaces, with an uplift in cycle parking provision. Construction on the Main Site began in May 2021, with the temporary Morrisons store having opened in February 2021. The first homes were targeted for completion in September 2025, and final completion for the wider development is projected for July 2033.
Based on Camden Council Planning Application number: 2025/0939/P
Camden Goods Yard, Chalk Farm Road, London NW1 8EH
Variation of Conditions 3, 4, 5, 6 (approved drawings and documents) and 73 (number and mix of residential units) of planning permission 2017/3847/P dated 15/6/18 (as amended by permission refs. 2020/0034/P, 2020/3116/P and 2022/3646/P) to secure amendments including: a reduction in the number of homes; a reduction in the percentage of affordable housing; alterations to the mix of homes provided; an increase to the building footprint of Block E1; reductions to the heights of Blocks C, E1, E2 & F; an increase in the height of Block D to accommodate a lift overrun; provision of additional staircases to Blocks C, E1 and F; and relocation of escape stairs for the supermarket. This application is accompanied by an addendum to the original Environmental Statement.
Application number: 2025/0939/P
Application type: Variation or Removal of Condition(s)
The project aims to blend Camden’s vibrant culture with natural elements, located near Camden Market, Primrose Hill, and Regent’s Park.
Recent Milestones:
Showhome Launch (July 2025): The Rossetti Showhome, showcasing British design and craftsmanship, opened at Camden Goods Yard. The Sales and Marketing Suite is open daily (10am–6pm Monday–Saturday, 10am–5pm Sunday) at Chalk Farm Rd, London NW1 8EH.
Open Weekend (November–December 2024): An open weekend on November 30 and December 1, 2024, celebrated the launch of The Albany show home in the Signature Collection.
Topping Out (October 2023): The project reached a significant milestone with the topping out of Primrose House, the first building completed, marking progress in the regeneration.
Groundbreaking (September 2021): Camden Council, St George, and Morrisons officially broke ground, initiating the transformation of the site.
Controversy Over Affordable Housing:
In early 2025, St George requested Camden Council’s approval to reduce the total number of homes from 644 to 637 and cut affordable housing from 203 to 83 units, dropping the affordable housing proportion from 31.5% to 15%. This reduction falls below the mayor’s 35% affordable housing requirement (by habitable rooms). St George cited “commercial risk” and economic challenges over the past seven years, with a negative outlook for the next 12–24 months, as reasons to improve project viability. The application is under review by Camden Council’s planning committee, with a final decision pending from City Hall.
This move has sparked criticism, with concerns about eroding Camden’s diversity and community needs, including school closures.
Economic and Community Impact:
The project is expected to create over 1,000 permanent jobs, offer apprenticeships, work experience placements, school visits, and community events during construction.
Camden is highlighted as a growth hub in London, with the Camden Goods Yard seen as a prime investment opportunity due to its vibrant creative and tech industries, as noted in CBRE’s 'Residential Hot 100' report.
The development includes community-focused features like public art, play facilities, and allotments, aiming to benefit the wider Camden community.
Morrisons’ Role:
The new 48,000–55,000 sq ft Morrisons supermarket will feature a market kitchen offering freshly prepared food, enhancing the neighborhood experience.
Morrisons previously sold the Camden site to Berkeley for £120m in 2020, part of a broader strategy amid challenging trading conditions, as reported at the time.
While Morrisons announced closures of 17 Morrisons Daily convenience stores and 52 cafés across the UK in April 2025, the Camden Goods Yard supermarket is a full-scale flagship store and not affected by these closures.
Broader Context:
The redevelopment aligns with Camden’s growth as a borough, with new property completions boosting rental supply in NW1.
The project sits within Camden’s larger planning framework, with nearby areas like Juniper Crescent and Gilbeys Yard also undergoing revitalization.
Camden has seen positive community developments, such as a historic drop in violent crime in 2025, attributed to outreach programs, which could enhance the appeal of the Goods Yard project.
The information is drawn from web sources dated up to July 16, 2025, including Berkeley Group’s official updates, news outlets, and local reports.
For further details on the project, visit the Berkeley Group’s website (https://www.berkeleygroup.co.uk) or Camden Council’s news page (https://news.camden.gov.uk). For Morrisons-related updates, check their official channels.
Gilbey’s Yard is a brick built postmodern housing estate built in the 1990’s. It comprises 3-4 storey socially rented flats and houses arranged in rows parallel to the Regent’s Canal with cobbled yard space in between. There is a small public playground and viewing area facing onto the canal. The density of homes at the estate is relatively low for the location, but the accommodation is understood to be in reasonably good condition.
The building at 30 Oval Road faces onto the canal and the yard. This building was substantially redeveloped following planning permission in 2009 and comprises 70 flats with offices at ground and basement levels.
There is a wealth of subterranean heritage below the yard, including the former horse tunnels linking through to the stables and the Winding Vaults. The privately owned cobbled yard links through to the Interchange building.
The public realm in the yard is largely car dominated, with informal parking, uneven surfaces, damaged cobbles and protruding bin stores contributing to a cluttered pedestrian environment. Being located close to the town centre and the towpath, the cul-de-sac like arrangement makes the area secluded. The yard is in frequent use by servicing vehicles catering for the Lock Market, the Interchange Building and the other properties in the area. The area is also reportedly used for taxi collections. Anti-social behaviour is an issue in the yard, which causes a nuisance for existing residents.
Oval Road is the main route connecting to the south of Gilbey’s Yard. This area has the more traditional street pattern of the Camden Town Conservation Area. To the south there are long views towards the BT Tower. Oval Road bridges the canal to meet the yards to its north. The road comes to an abrupt end at Gilbey’s Yard with only a very narrow pedestrian and cycle link continuing between the Gilbey’s Yard properties into the Morrisons car park.
At Gilbey’s Yard, the Council will support measures to improve the relationship of the estate with its surrounding environment and where possible deliver additional homes.
The general approach to existing estates in the framework area is set out on page 29. Development within the Gilbey’s Yard area will be expected to contribute towards the following key objectives:
• Respond to the robust industrial character of the historic canal environment and architecture.
• Provide for a continuation of Oval Road through the yard and into the Morrisons site for pedestrians and cyclists, creating an important connection to the southern part of the framework area and connecting with surrounding communities.
• Knit into the surrounding urban grain, help integrate the framework area with surrounding areas and provide a comfortable transition from existing neighbourhoods into new.
• Development should significantly improve the environment of Gilbey’s Yard, including the removal of informal parking, the rationalisation of street furniture such as bin stores, improved accessibility for all, general maintenance and repair works (including damaged cobbles). Development proposals will need to be accompanied by parking and public realm management plans.
• The environment should promote community safety through good design and natural surveillance. The area should have a clear hierarchy of public and private areas and secluded areas and dead-ends should be removed or addressed to minimise opportunities for anti-social behaviour.
• Development should include improved servicing arrangements, so that they minimise impacts on residential amenity.
• Improve the open space and facilities for children’s play, this could also include quieter open space areas. Door-step play is particularly important given the concentration of family housing.
• Preserving and enhancing heritage features above and below ground. Taking opportunities to connect with the heritage of the area for example by enabling the winding vaults to be opened to the public.
• Consider the role of the estate in its existing context and potential future context (if development of neighbouring sites was to occur). This should include how the estate could be adapted to form part of an inclusive wider neighbourhood.